翻訳と辞書 ・ Smith Township, Indiana
・ Smith Township, Mahoning County, Ohio
・ Smith Township, Ohio
・ Smith Township, Posey County, Indiana
・ Smith Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania
・ Smith Township, Whitley County, Indiana
・ Smith v Croft (No 2)
・ Smith v Eric S Bush
・ Smith v Gardner Merchant
・ Smith v Glasgow City District Council
・ Smith v Hughes
・ Smith v Knights of Columbus
・ Smith v Land and House Property Corp
・ Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd
・ Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
・ Smith v Parsons
・ Smith v Smith
・ Smith v. Allwright
・ Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County
・ Smith v. Bolles
・ Smith v. California
・ Smith v. Commissioner
・ Smith v. Doe
・ Smith v. Goguen
・ Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
・ Smith v. Maryland
・ Smith v. Pilots Union
・ Smith v. Spisak
・ Smith v. Summit Entertainment LLC
・ Smith v. Texas
|
|
| Smith v Parsons ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Smith v Parsons
In ''Smith v Parsons'', an important case in South African succession law, Smith was the partner of the deceased who sought an order in terms of section 2(3) to accept the deceased’s suicide note as an amendment to the will. The deceased had validly executed a will in 2003 appointing his son, Jeremy, as his sole heir. The suicide note said that Smith could have the house they had lived in and that she had access to a bank account holding about R600,000 and the residue of his estate was to go to his son. The question before the court was whether the suicide note could constitute a codicil (amendment). The court held that the crucial question was whether the deceased intended the suicide note to be a codicil. It was held that the deceased’s intention was for the document to be a suicide note and not an amendment to his will, as the onus of proving an express intention to amend was not discharged.
== See also ==
* South African succession law
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Smith v Parsons」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|